- Home
- Part 1: Overview of IPC
- 1.1 What the IPC is
- 1.2 Why it is needed
- 1.3 How it works
- 1.4 Added value
- 1.5 Key features
- 1.6 Key challenges and limitations
- 1.7 The IPC conceptual framework
- 1.8 Relevance for decision makers
- 1.9 Relevance for analysts
- 1.10 Analysis cycle
- 1.11 Governance structure
- 1.12 Introduction and institutionalization of the IPC at the country level
- 1.13 Quality and support strategy
- 1.14 Technical development
- Part 2A: IPC Acute Food Insecurity Protocols
- Overview of IPC Acute Food Insecurity Protocols
- Function 1: Build Technical Consensus
- Function 2: Classify Severity and Identify Key Drivers
- Protocols for completing Function 2
- Protocol 2.1: Converge evidence using the IPC Analytical Framework
- Protocol 2.2: Compare evidence against the IPC Acute Food Insecurity Reference Table
- Protocol 2.3: Adhere to analytical parameters
- Protocol 2.4: Evaluate evidence reliability
- Protocol 2.5: Meet minimum evidence and analysis requirements
- Protocol 2.6: Systematically document evidence and analysis, and make them available upon request
- Function 3: Communicate for Action
- Function 4: Quality Assurance
- IPC Famine Classification – Special Additional Protocols
- IPC Classification in Areas with Limited or No Humanitarian Access – Special Additional Protocols
- Part 2B: IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Protocols
- Overview of IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Protocols
- Function 1: Build Technical Consensus
- Function 2: Classify Severity and Identify Key Drivers
- Protocols for completing Function 2
- Protocol 2.1: Converge evidence using the IPC Analytical Framework
- Protocol 2.2: Compare evidence against the IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Reference Table
- Protocol 2.3: Adhere to analytical parameters
- Protocol 2.4: Evaluate evidence reliability
- Protocol 2.5: Meet minimum evidence and analysis requirements
- Protocol 2.6: Systematically document evidence and analysis, and make them available upon request
- Function 3: Communicate for Action
- Function 4: Quality Assurance
- Part 2C: IPC Acute Malnutrition Protocols
- Overview of IPC Acute Malnutrition Protocols
- Function 1: Build Technical Consensus
- Function 2: Classify Severity and Identify Key Drivers
- Protocols for completing Function 2
- Protocol 2.1: Converge evidence using the IPC Analytical Framework
- Protocol 2.2: Compare evidence against the IPC Acute Malnutrition Reference Table
- Protocol 2.3: Adhere to analytical parameters
- Protocol 2.4: Evaluate evidence reliability
- Protocol 2.5: Meet minimum evidence and analysis requirements
- Protocol 2.6: Systematically document evidence and analysis, and make them available upon request
- Function 3: Communicate for Action
- Function 4: Quality Assurance
- IPC Classification in Areas with Limited or No Humanitarian Access – Special Additional Protocols
Protocol 3.3: Strategically share Communication products in a timely manner
IPC communication products, including the Analysis Report and maps, should be shared with relevant stakeholders as soon as they are finalized, preferably within one or two months from the completion of analysis. Three key activities should be implemented to accomplish the protocol, as described in Box 75.
